Arshavin, Fabregas, Nasri or Wilshere are selfish on the pitch. They're younger as well, so they're more perspective. Maybe that's why they play more.
Well, as you can see, the first explanation to the rumours regarding Rosický is, sadly, blatantly simple and speaks for itself: most of the Czech sports journalists have never been quite the brightest ones you'll ever see. The same applies to most of the commentators and pundits - the level of writing about football in Czech Republic, at least in the mainstream press, is mostly nowhere near worth talking about. Take an average piece about Premier League - and it's probably worse than reading anything from Stan Collymore. It's dull, amateurish and it's not more intellectually challenging than babbling of a twelve-year-old kid in the comments. It's tiring, really. Almost like this.
While it's true that Rosický hasn't played as much as he might deserve, given his undeniable talent, desire, workrate and experience, there are more reasons for that. Firstly it's down to the fact that he's only been available after his long-term injury and subsequent and inevitable niggles for a couple of months (note: Wenger has always said that it takes a player almost the same length of his previous injury to fully recover). Rosický, having come back after a year and a half at the beginning of the last season, has played 33 games out of possible 53 in 2009/10, so it's almost baffling, due to his injury record, that he hasn't been injured since the start of this season. He's still hardly reliable not to concede an injury though, so I'm suggesting Wenger is not rushing him back too much, granted, as he has plenty of other options to choose from as Arsenal haven't been struck by too many injuries on his position. As it's Arsenal, though, this can change within a week, so I wouldn't worry too much about Rosický not starting in every game at the moment.
No comments:
Post a Comment